|
Greetings:
U of M advocates played an essential role this year in getting
people to think about the future of the U. No truer sign of this
was seen than during the last week of the 2009 legislative
session. Advocates' praise and concerns about the U's
place in our state remained part of the legislative dialogue
well after our last action alert, and surely helped to mitigate
the cuts the U received.
Their advocacy also helped get the Bell Museum project to the
governor's desk for the second year in a row as part of a
supplemental bonding package. While the Bell project did not
make the final cut, the U received $25 million for building
preservation and restoration as well as $2.5 million for a solar
research lab.
When the 2009 session began, the state's $4.6 billion deficit
made it clear that the U would have to prepare for financial
challenges ahead. Still, the events of the last few days have
created an increasingly difficult set of circumstances for the
U. Legislative leaders and Governor Pawlenty did not reach
agreement on which revenue sources to use to close a $3 billion
deficit gap. The governor must now shift payments and unallot
(cancel) state funding in order to bring the state's budget into
balance for the next two years.
Last night, President Bruininks outlined the practical impacts
of unallotment in an email to University faculty and staff:
- Make no mistake: the University is being cut
substantially. We are facing a cut to our state budget
base of 7 percent or $104M, with a likely additional unallotment
that will take us to 13 percent or $178M. You'll likely hear
smaller cuts quoted in the media--these quoted numbers are
inaccurate, because they rely on federal stimulus dollars that
disappear after 2010-11, leaving the University and the state
facing a steep cliff in the next biennium. In other words, the
quoted cuts are temporary; the real reduction is permanent.
- Federal stimulus dollars provide essential, but
temporary, relief. We anticipate approximately $89M in
federal stimulus funds to help us reduce the impact of these
cuts during the next two years. By law, stimulus funds are
dedicated for specific uses, including mitigating tuition
increases, preserving jobs, and maintaining essential
educational services. Approximately half of this money will go
directly to financial support for students to help cushion the
impact of projected tuition increases.
- Despite deep cuts, Minnesota students will be
protected. Thanks to our new middle-income scholarship
program, new federal stimulus grants, and newly expanded federal
tax credits, under current tuition models, 60 percent of
resident undergraduates will actually pay less next year than
they paid this year--$1,000 to $2,900 less, depending on family
income. The remaining Minnesota students (from families earning
more than $160K each year) will experience an increase of just
$300 in next year and $450 in 2010-11.
- The U is aggressively reducing its costs.
Just five years ago, the University absorbed a cut of $185M or
15 percent to its state budget base. At that time, we had a
number of tools available for managing these reductions, so that
despite the cut, we were able to improve quality, productivity,
and management at the University. We serve the same number of
students now as we did then, and we have grown our sponsored
research enterprise and kept pace with rising costs, all with
flat or declining support from the state (in real dollars
adjusted for inflation). We continue to reduce costs and
increase efficiency--and, in fact, next year we will cut $94M in
existing costs and reallocate those resources to current and
emerging University priorities.
In the next few weeks we will provide a more complete review of
the legislative session and its impact upon the U of M. We will
also continue to share news and ideas via @supporttheU on
Twitter, and encourage you to join us there.
Until then, thank you for supporting this great Minnesota
institution.
|